Faa Orders Boeing 787 Inspections 2025. Faa Orders Boeing 787 Inspections 2024 Amalia Jillian The FAA plans to mandate Boeing-recommended inspections of forward pressure bulkheads (FPB) on some 980 787s to address production quality problems discovered several years ago FAA Orders Inspection, Replacement of 737NG Engine Parts.
FAA Orders Review Of Boeing 787 Dreamliner News from g-starnews.blogspot.com
In August 2024, the FAA mandated inspections of 787 seat track splice fittings The FAA proposed directive stated that operators should take all applicable actions in accordance with the accomplishment instructions in Boeing's Alert Requirements Bulletin, dated October 5, 2024
FAA Orders Review Of Boeing 787 Dreamliner News
Photo: Boeing FAA Orders 787 Seat-Track Inspection These defects stem from the use of incorrect titanium alloys, specifically, Grade 1 or 2 commercially pure unalloyed titanium instead of the FAA-approved Grade 5. On January 17, the FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the Boeing 787-8, 787-9, and 787-10, saying that following multiple supplier notices of escapement (NOE), the finalized directive would mandate inspections of seat track splice fittings to determine whether the part was manufactured from a non-compliant alloy.
US FAA opens new probe into Boeing 787 inspections — Capital Brief. On January 15, the FAA released a proposed rule following reports from suppliers highlighting potential defects in Boeing 787 seat-track splice fittings, as flagged by FlightGlobal. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of multiple nonconformances, including excessive gaps and pull-up, found during the assembly and installation of the forward pressure bulkhead.
FAA opens new probe into Boeing 787 inspections. On January 17, the FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the Boeing 787-8, 787-9, and 787-10, saying that following multiple supplier notices of escapement (NOE), the finalized directive would mandate inspections of seat track splice fittings to determine whether the part was manufactured from a non-compliant alloy. These defects stem from the use of incorrect titanium alloys, specifically, Grade 1 or 2 commercially pure unalloyed titanium instead of the FAA-approved Grade 5.